|





|
Law
Office Communications - Using Voice Mail Effectively
 | Original Publication: DICTA
(Publication of the KBA) |
 | Author: Dave Kristy, Firm
Administrator for Butler, Vines and Babb |
 | Date Published: November 1998 |
Today, there are more ways to
communicate than ever. The proliferation of fax machines, mobile
telephones, pagers, voice mail, and e-mail, have given us the
ability to reach anyone, anywhere, at virtually any time.
Ironically, when used improperly, these tools can sometimes
create a breakdown in communication. In particular, the
effective use of voice mail and e-mail in the law office can
greatly enhance our ability to communicate, but we must be
careful to use these tools properly. In this first part of a
two-part series, we will examine some of the "do's"
and "don'ts" when it comes to the use of voice mail.
Voice Mail
The impact of a voice messaging
system can be far greater than the impact of the pink message
slips of the past, and capabilities far exceed that of the home
answering machine. Voice messaging features include:
 | The ability to send and retrieve
messages 24 hours a day from anywhere you can access a
telephone. Some argue that the biggest benefit of a voice
messaging system is enhancement of internal
communications - more so than external. Up to 65% of
messages come from other subscribers. |
 | The ability to leave detailed
information instead of simple requests to return a call or
"see me". This allows the receiving party to
complete a request when physical contact is not possible. |
 | The ability to forward copies of
messages to other subscribers, ensuring that the message is
passed along exactly as it was sent. |
 | The ability to confirm that a message
has been retrieved, and exactly when it was retrieved, by
the intended party. |
 | The ability to broadcast a message to a
large group of people simultaneously. |
Of course, there are still many
voice mail skeptics, though that number is dwindling. They may
have found themselves at one time or another trapped in
"voice mail prison", listening to numerous menu
choices given by an automated attendant, seemingly without the
option of talking to an actual human being! We have all had such
an experience. This gives voice messaging a bad rap. The
business you have called has simply not set the system up
properly.
Here are some Do's and Don'ts for
establishing an effective voice messaging system:
Do:
 | Ask for
detailed messages. Callers need to be reminded that they can
leave detailed information and you wish to receive it. |
 | Leave detailed
messages. The ability to leave detailed information is what sets
voice messaging apart from the old pink message slips of the
past. A message such as "call me" defeats the purpose
of voice messaging. Ask for the information you need or
provide requested information. |
 | Personally record your mail box greeting
in your own voice. This gives a caller assurance that they
have reached the correct party. |
 | Give your caller an "escape
route" in your greeting to get personal assistance from
the receptionist. This would be something like "dial zero
for immediate personal assistance." |
 | Utilize advanced features, such
as forwarding messages to other interested parties, or
broadcasting a message to a group of people - something you
can't easily do with paper messages. |
 | Return your calls as soon as possible.
Voice messages, like paper messages, should be returned within
24 hours. |
 | Establish a "back
door" telephone number, using an automated attendant, for
employees or close acquaintances only to connect with
the office and reach members of the firm without having to go
through the receptionist. |
Don't:
 | Don't use an automated
attendant for regular incoming calls. Except for
non-business hours, an automated attendant should have very
limited use (see above). Clients expect personal attention
in the delivery of law services, and they have a right to
expect the same when they call the law firm's office. |
 | Don't ever force callers to
leave messages in a voice mail box. Again, in a professional
firm, the option of leaving a voice message should be
left to the caller. Written messages can still be taken. |
 | Don't make your voice mail box
greeting longer than 15 seconds. Although virtually all
systems permit the bypass of a greeting (by depressing a key
on the keypad, such as # or *), callers leaving a message
don't want to listen to a long greeting - they just want the
beep. |
 | Don't record greetings such as
"today is November 10th and I'm in the
office today...", unless you are certain that you will
keep your greeting up to date. It is encouraging for a
caller to hear that you have recorded a greeting just for
today, but it is discouraging to hear a greeting from
three weeks ago. It makes the caller wonder whether you are
even checking your messages. |
Conclusion
There can be no argument that the
best communication always takes place face-to-face. All senses
can be used in expressing ideas and emotions. Body language and
tone of voice give a great deal of information to the recipient.
Unfortunately, most of the time, face-to-face communication is
not possible or practical. Some estimate that people fail to
reach their intended party the first time, either with a
telephone call or visit, up to 90% of the time. In the past,
this usually resulted in the standard pink slip message to
"see me" or "call me back", only to have the
recipient attempt to call back and, naturally, not reach the
party up to 90% of the time! This is what we call
"telephone tag" - a failure to communicate that is a
tremendous waste of time and resources.
Paying special attention to the items
above will go a long way toward ensuring that your voice
messaging system is an effective communication tool for your law
firm, and hopefully dispel some of the myths and poor
perceptions about voice mail, eliminating much of that wasted
time.
In part two of this series on office
communications (December 1998) , we will discuss the proper use
of e-mail.

©
Copyright 2004 ALA-Knoxville Chapter. All Rights Reserved.
Questions or comments about this
site should be directed to
The
Web Master
DISCLAIMER: The Knoxville Chapter of the Association
of Legal Administrators is a separate legal entity from the Association of Legal
Administrators (ALA). ALA licenses the use of its name, mark, logos and other
protected properties to chapters which are in good standing. ALA disclaims all
liability or responsibility whatsoever for the actions, representations and
liabilities of the Knoxville Chapter, specifically including those of any nature
whatsoever arising from or out of the content of the other features related to
the Knoxville Chapter Web site. In no event shall the ALA be deemed the
guarantor of the Knoxville Chapter.
|
|
|
| |
|
Highlighted Vendor
Partners: |
|
 |
| |
|
 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|