|





|
The
Cost Of Staying Healthy
 | Original Publication: DICTA
(Publication of the KBA) |
 | Author: Tom Sims of Hodges,
Doughty & Carson |
 | Date Published: September, 2002 |
According
to the U. S. Chamber of Commerce, health insurance is the most
expensive single benefit for U. S. employers.
A recent survey showed that employers spent 10.5% of
their payroll, or $4,800 per employee, on health care.
Although that figure may be a little high for Knoxville
law firms, I believe most of us can testify to the fact that
medical insurance has been the fastest increasing expense for
our firms over the past several years.
The cost of health insurance nationwide has increased on
the average of 20 to 30 percent over the past two years.
By the year 2008, premiums are predicted to double.
At
the same time health insurance premiums are rising, employees
have become disenchanted with managed care and many are
possessed by a sense of entitlement.
They regard the best health care money can buy as their
inalienable right. Employers
are no longer willing to foot the bill, but at the same time we
must remain competitive in providing good benefits in order to
recruit and retain topflight employees.
Having
just gone through the trauma of renewing our firm’s group
medical insurance coverage, I thought that I would share some of
what we learned and offer some suggestions about what can be
done to help control this cost.
I
consider our firm to be a relatively healthy group.
We have been blessed not to have any catastrophic
illnesses. Yet, when
we received our renewal rates in June, they represented a 56.1%
increase in premium. I
had heard about rate increases in the 20% to 30% range, and I
was prepared for a double-digit increase, but I never
anticipated this.
Due
to privacy issues, health insurance providers will not furnish
information regarding claims.
In our case, the insurance company rationalized the
increase as follows:
(1)
A change in SIC codes:
No one could tell me what SIC stands for, but it
apparently has to do with an industry rating of the risk.
According to our insurer, they have apparently concluded
that law firms are not as a good a risk as we were a year ago.
If your policy has not already renewed this year, get
ready for a 15% rate increase on this factor alone.
(2)
Age and sex: We are all a year older. Hiring
younger employees is not necessarily the answer.
Women of childbearing age are a higher risk.
(3)
Loss ratio: Insurers
claim that they break even with a loss ratio between 70% and
80%. They will tell
you what your loss ratio is, but they won’t provide specific
information to back up their figures.
(4)
Pharmacy trend: This
is the big one. According
to insurers, not only is the cost of drugs increasing, but also
there has been an increase in use of prescription drugs over the
past few years. There
is almost an epidemic in drug use, and according to one source,
Tennessee leads the nation on a per capita basis.
The cost of prescription drugs is increasing 2 or 3 times
the normal inflation rate. Drug
companies are well represented by lobbyists, they are spending
an all time high on advertising and they are using legal
loopholes to delay generic competition with their products.
A
few years ago, there was a greater market of insurers and we
could shop the market for competitive quotes.
Several of those insurers have now pulled out and
currently there are fewer companies writing health insurance
coverage for small groups in East Tennessee.
Those companies are reluctant to take on any new business
for less than a premium price.
If your firm has much in the way of health history,
competitive quotes may not be a viable option.
So
what are we to do? It’s
not possible for lawyers to increase hourly fees at the same
rate medical insurers are increasing their premiums.
With other overhead costs increasing all around us, most
lawyers are not willing to absorb the large increases associated
with providing this benefit to their employees.
There are only two other options: maintain the same level
of coverage and have our employees pay part of the premium, or
reduce the level of benefits.
Neither option is desirable, but the most palatable is a
reduction in benefits, which results in the people who use the
coverage most often absorbing more of the expense.
Here are some suggestions:
 |
Increase
the physician’s co-pay.
The most common co-pay is $20.00 per visit.
|
 |
Decrease
the co-insurance factor:
If you currently have a 90/70 plan, consider changing
to an 80/60 or even an 80/50 plan.
If patients are treated at a preferred facility, the
insurance company pays 80% of approved charges after the
annual deductible. Be
sure that your employees are fully aware of which facilities
are approved. To
protect against large losses, maintain a maximum out of
pocket limit of $1,000.
In most cases, when an employee is hospitalized, the
maximum they will incur is $1,000 plus their deductible.
|
 |
Increase
your policy deductible:
If your policy currently has a $250 deductible,
increase it to $500. If
you already have a $500 deductible, consider increasing it
to $1,000 and self-insure for the second $500.
Unless a high percentage of your employees are
hospitalized, you will undoubtedly save money.
|
 |
Increase
the prescription drug co-pay for brand name or formulary
drugs. Maintain
a low co-pay for generic drugs.
If a generic substitute is available, most employees
will be more inclined to use it.
Employees should be encouraged to ask their doctor,
or pharmacist, if a generic brand or a substitute drug is
available. Consider
adding a prescription drug deductible.
|
In
our case, we were able to reduce the premium increase from 56.1%
to 1.62% by implementing some of these changes.
That takes care of this year, but what about next year
and the years after? Something’s
got to change. Some
of us remember the days of the indemnity policies.
Then came some radical changes in the medical insurance
industry in the form of managed care.
PPO’s, POS’s and HMO’s are now prevalent.
For the most part, indemnity policies are a thing of the
past. What’s on
the horizon? According
to one expert, “the current programs are good for a couple
more years, but not much beyond that.
In five or ten years, we’ll need to have a substantial
paradigm shift”. We
are at a crossroad, but it is unclear what the next phase may
look like. Large
employers, who have more leverage, are experimenting with direct
contracting with medical providers.
Some smaller and midsize companies are banding together
in purchasing coalitions. I’m
not sure if that would work for Knoxville law firms, but it’s
worth looking into. In
an informal survey, I found that several of our law firms are
insured by the same company.
Other employers are offering employees a “defined
contribution” in the form of a voucher or cash with which they
can purchase health care on their own.
That option is completely out of sync with the needs of
most of our employees. It
eliminates what little leverage we have as a group and employees
with a medical history would have a difficult time finding
suitable insurance coverage at an affordable price.
And some employees may choose to pocket the cash and take
the risk of going uninsured.
Some large companies are offering their employees the
“next generation of healthcare coverage” known as
consumer-directed health plans.
Employers allocate an annual amount to spend on medical
expenses, and employees use those funds to pay for medical care.
Once employees have spent the funding in their account,
they must pay out of pocket for healthcare service until they
reach an annual deductible.
At that point, a traditional health plan kicks in to
provide coverage. To
be effective, employees need to be educated about healthcare
cost drivers and they will need to make significant shifts in
how they think about healthcare spending.
The theory is, if people think it’s their own money
they are spending, they are not going to spend it as much.
The
traditional way we have all bought medical insurance in the past
is no longer very effective.
We get notice of our renewal rates thirty days before the
expiration of our current policy, and we make hasty decisions
about what to do. We
need to be thinking and planning 2 years in advance and working
on ways to reduce the cost of medical insurance by reducing the
need for medical treatment.
If insurance companies are paying out more than they are
bringing in, they are going to continue to charge higher
premiums. So we need
to figure out a way to stay healthy and reduce claims.
The long-term solution for rising health care costs must
include employee accountability.
Employees must be encouraged to manage their individual
health. We need to
educate our employees on disease control and staying healthy.
One local organization that assists employers in this
area is HealthCare 21. It
was formed about 5 years ago by a coalition of employers
including TVA, Pilot Corporation, the City of Knoxville and Knox
County Government. It
is currently made up of 115 members, including employers and
health care providers, in the Knoxville, Chattanooga and
Cleveland area. It
is a non-profit organization whose purpose is to improve the
quality of health care through a combination of price, service
and quality. Visit
their web site at www.healthcare21.org,
or call them at 292-2121 for more information.
There’s
no easy answer. Be
prepared to address continuing premium increases in the near
term, expect changes in the industry in the long term and start
planning now on ways to reduce your costs by reducing the need
for medical care.

©
Copyright 2004 ALA-Knoxville Chapter. All Rights Reserved.
Questions or comments about this
site should be directed to
The
Web Master
DISCLAIMER: The Knoxville Chapter of the Association
of Legal Administrators is a separate legal entity from the Association of Legal
Administrators (ALA). ALA licenses the use of its name, mark, logos and other
protected properties to chapters which are in good standing. ALA disclaims all
liability or responsibility whatsoever for the actions, representations and
liabilities of the Knoxville Chapter, specifically including those of any nature
whatsoever arising from or out of the content of the other features related to
the Knoxville Chapter Web site. In no event shall the ALA be deemed the
guarantor of the Knoxville Chapter.
|
|
|
| |
|
Highlighted Vendor
Partners: |
|
 |
| |
|
 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|