|





|
Managing
Insurance Costs
 | Original Publication: DICTA
(Publication of the KBA) |
 | Author: Marc
A. Upchurch, Business Manager for Kramer, Rayson, Leake,
Rodgers & Morgan, LLP |
 | Date Published: June, 2003 |
Have
you tried to make sense of the insurance market lately?
As have all of my peers in law firm management, I have been
surprised at the size of proposed increases and the audacity of
insurers in the last couple of years. It is clearly a “hard” market and the insurers seem to be
taking full advantage of it.
Insurance is already a substantial cost to most firms and
the expectation is that significant increases will continue for
the foreseeable future.
The
reasons for the rise are as numerous as they are varied.
The insurance industry has been a “soft” market for
many years and premium increases have not kept up with the costs.
Insurance companies, large and small, are failing.
The industry is in a consolidation phase (fewer
competitors, higher costs for the user).
Investment portfolio profits are down.
Malpractice litigation has increased significantly in the
past few years. Health
care and pharmacy drug usage is up.
Property and casualty risks are higher.
Underwriter costs are increasing.
Government mandates and regulation have increased the
burden on insurers. Inflation
is always a factor. Throw
September 11th on top of all this and its impossible to
discern the real cause.
I
attended a seminar recently where The Factors Driving Rising Costs
in Health Care from 2001-2002 were delineated as follows (Source:
Employee Benefit News: Benefits Sourcebook 2003, Volume 16 -
PricewaterhouseCoopers, April 2002):
 |
Drugs,
Medical Devices & Other Medical Advances (Usage)
22% |
 |
Rising
Provider Expenses
18% |
 |
General
Inflation (CPI)
18% |
 |
Increased
Consumer Demand
15% |
 |
Government
Mandates & Regulations
15% |
 |
Litigation
& Risk Management
7% |
 |
Fraud
&
Other
5% |
Of
this list Usage I can buy, Government Regulations I can see but I
question the amount assigned, and I’ll give them Litigation
& Risk Management and Fraud & Other for simplicity. The other factors are “soft” to me. Rising Provider Expenses are probably up due to increased
insurance costs which they pay themselves.
Increased Consumer Demand, my personal favorite, is simply
taking advantage of our needs at a premium for themselves (the old
supply & demand model). General
Inflation (CPI) makes up 18% of the increase.
CPI from 2001 to 2002 was ~ 2.4%.
Accordingly, if you receive a 50% increase in rates, this
model would suggest that 9% of it is due to inflation (18% of the
rate increase times a 50% increase).
In short, 51% of our proposed increases seem to me to be
because we need it, they haven’t been able to control their
costs and they generally want more profits.
One
more thing, I believe much of the September 11th hype
is an excuse. Sure,
insurers will feel a significant erosion of their capital base,
but they have the reserves. One
source I looked at noted that losses were expected to run from $40
billion to as much as $70 billion out of some $300 billion in
capital held by those insurers. Then you can deduct whatever the government (our tax dollars)
covers out of those losses.
Now
reality. Insurance
companies have relied on the returns from their investment
portfolios to support insured products and losses for a long time
and the last 4 years have taken this away.
There are a limited number of insurers and underwriters and
demand is high right now. Frankly,
it’s a “hard” market and insurance companies are taking
advantage of it while it’s available to them.
Generally, you get renewal quotes a few days before your
current insurance expires, have limited time to look at other
options and accept an unreasonable increase or substantially
reduce your coverage just to get it all behind you.
Insurers and underwriters hold these until the 11th
hour to make sure they don’t miss anything or that something
doesn’t change that would impact their proposal negatively.
You or your agent will have to push hard and stay on top of
it.
I
just reviewed a summary of first quarter 2003 results for 5 of the
larger insurers. The
most telling factor was the Combined Ratio (losses plus expenses
as compared to premiums) of these companies.
Historically, these amounts are in excess of 100%, which
was offset by investment earnings.
The average of the 5 I included in the summary was ~91%
meaning the premium increases seem to have already resulted in a
substantial turnaround in the financial health of these insurers
before any investment returns are included. The summary also included some CEO comments which ranged from
good to excellent first quarter results, record earnings, solid
execution. Then it
had an outlook with terms like downright giddy, expecting to
continue with substantial rate increases, strategy is to reduce
limits, significant opportunity, no end in sight
to
a hard market and best domestic D&O rates ever seen.
Indications
are that we will continue to see proposed rate increases in the
20% range across all lines of insurance, with substantially more
than that (50% to 60%) in professional liability insurance
premiums. We simply
have to try managing this problem before it gets too costly and
cumbersome to handle.
Now
that I’ve gotten all that off my chest, how about some practical
suggestions of how to manage the process better.
 |
Get
an agent that specializes in the type of insurance your are
seeking. A
knowledgeable agent can help you identify your best options,
understands which insurers fit your needs best, assists you in
the application process, helps you sift through the
intricacies of the various alternatives and helps you identify
ways to manage your programs with minimal increases, while
maintaining an acceptable level of coverage.
Too often, we buy all our insurance from a friend or
contact when their niche is only in one area. |
 |
Require
your current provider to provide you with loss runs 90 days
before the end of your policy period.
They are required to submit them to you at your
request. While these are sometimes hard to read and understand,
they will help you evaluate the insurer’s basis for
increases. This
will provide you with a tool to help evaluate how much margin
your insurer is receiving on your coverage.
It also provides you with information on your costs
that can be useful in determining areas where concessions in
coverage are least likely to affect your workforce while
maximizing your cost savings. |
 |
Start
the quote process much earlier and require your agent to get
competitive quotes. The
whole thing will still drag out to the deadline, but hopefully
you have had a chance to evaluate the reasonableness of the
quotes from your current provider and the options available. |
 |
Examine
your true needs. Make
sure your deductibles aren’t arbitrarily low compared to
industry standards and your firm size.
Especially in malpractice coverage, the insurer wants
you to share the risk and a low deductible puts most of the
risk in their lap. Generally, a $25,000 deductible is the minimum allowed,
but most insurers want to see these amounts higher so the
firms are on the hook first.
Decide what you are trying to cover. If
it’s a catastrophe, then maybe a higher deductible still
meets that need. Look
at your claims history and at the financial health of the
partners to see what level of risk you can weather internally.
Obviously, the higher the deductible the lower the risk
to the insurer, thus the lower premium. |
 |
Take
some time in completing the application.
An underwriter behind some desk far, far away from you
will be determining the risk associated with your application.
A haphazardly completed application could be your worst
enemy. One wrong
answer to a question they are focusing on, not enough
information or too much information could put you in a higher
risk category. This
is where an agent that knows the industry can help save you a
lot of money for many years to come. |
 |
Evaluate
your policies and procedures in light of the questions on the
applications. They
should provide you with insight as to what is expected or
desired from a risk evaluation perspective. |
 |
For
health, life and disability insurance, inform your staff of
the amounts and reasons for the increases.
This helps them realize the benefit you are providing
and gives them an understanding of why the increases are
happening. Don’t
be afraid to share the annual cost with them.
Since most people only consider the amount they are
paying, make sure to let them know your cost.
Done correctly, they will appreciate you more.
Hopefully, a more knowledgeable staff will help reduce
the increases in the future. |
 |
Consider
increasing deductibles or reducing benefits, especially out of
network benefits in a health plan. |
 |
Consider
cost sharing arrangements with your staff. Maybe set a base and have them cover a percentage of
increases as they occur.
Nothing brings out a desire to watch what you use
better than a hit to the pocketbook of an individual.
These last two have to be handled gently or they could
backfire, causing staffing problems that are bigger than the
insurance issue. |
 |
Get
an agent that specializes in the type of insurance your are
seeking. I
realize this one is in here twice.
That’s because I consider it to be a necessity.
If you do nothing else, this one can save you a ton of
time, energy and money. |
I
don’t really like the benefit reduction option or just accepting
a significant increase in the current year because they are much
longer term decisions than one might realize.
Once a benefit is lost, you will likely never see it again.
Once an increase is accepted, all subsequent increases are
compounded.
As
an administrator or an attorney responsible for these matters, get
a good agent (see I said it again), spend a lot of time
understanding what you have and determining what you need, then
work it hard by evaluating all your options.
For our firm, these costs are second only to our payroll
and they should receive attention accordingly.

©
Copyright 2004 ALA-Knoxville Chapter. All Rights Reserved.
Questions or comments about this
site should be directed to
The
Web Master
DISCLAIMER: The Knoxville Chapter of the Association
of Legal Administrators is a separate legal entity from the Association of Legal
Administrators (ALA). ALA licenses the use of its name, mark, logos and other
protected properties to chapters which are in good standing. ALA disclaims all
liability or responsibility whatsoever for the actions, representations and
liabilities of the Knoxville Chapter, specifically including those of any nature
whatsoever arising from or out of the content of the other features related to
the Knoxville Chapter Web site. In no event shall the ALA be deemed the
guarantor of the Knoxville Chapter.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Highlighted Vendor
Partners: |
|
 |
| |
|
 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|